http://kandiflossmagazine.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/not-sats.jpgThe SATs have been around since 1926 and it might be time for colleges to rethink the system.
According to Rick Garlikov, “...often schools teach "to the tests" by giving surface tricks and practice that merely rehearse students for certain limited kinds of content and questions -- those expected to be on the test. But that only treats symptoms and only gives the illusion of successful teaching and learning.” This has been an issue up for discussion over the past few years especially after the new addition of the writing component on the SAT.
Is the SAT a comprehensive assessment of the ability of a student, or the measure of how much a parent is willing to pay in order to have their child tutored for numerous hours on end. Kurt Landgraf, the President of the Educational Testing Service which is the company that designs the SAT said himself, "It's a measure of a student's ability to answer questions at a given place and time.” Does this show how well a person is going to do in the work force or how well they are going to do in college, no one is sure. What do you think?


